Obama, Bristol, Sex & Kindergarten

Sex Ed. for Kindergartners? Kind of.

Look, it’s not like we want to be writing about politics.  It’s not like we wouldn’t rather be talking about Ciara’s Vibe spread or how the Strokes’ modal songwriting is vaguely similar to Miles Davis’ Kind of Blue, but no one seems to be talking about the details of the Campaign and how Effen Vodka misleading they are.  So the knuck if you buck must stop here.

Case in point, John McCain’s recent add attacking Obama’s plan for Education.  As our faithful readers will know, we here at Modern Jackass aren’t blind adherents to the unsubstantiated Gospel of Barack.  We think he could do more.  We even identify with certain principles of the Republican party (Gunz!).  It’s not the ideologies that necessarily bother us but the libel the parties throw around disguised as legitimate debate.  In McCain’s attack ad, which we won’t even link to because it contributes nothing to the conversation of education reform, he accuses Obama of helping to pass “legislation that would teach comprehensive sex education to…kindergartners.”

Wow, that’s a pretty powerful claim, we thought to ourselves, and so insidiously misleading that it can’t possibly be true.  Sure, it’s not, but it also kind of is.

The legislation to which McCain’s attack ad is referring is Illinois S.B. 99, an amendment to the Illinois School Code’s sections on sex education and family life.  The passages McCain indirectly cites read verbatim as follows:

Each  class  or  course  in  comprehensive  sex
14    education offered in any of  grades  K  6  through  12  shall
15    include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted
16    infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread
17    of HIV AIDS.

Where struck out characters are those to be omitted in the renewed school code and those underlined are to be added.  So it’s true, Obama did support expanding “comprehensive sex education” to Kindergarten.  HOWEVER, the bill goes on to establish the following criteria like ten lines down:

   (2)  All  (1)  course material and instruction shall
13        be age and developmentally appropriate.

So though it is shocking to imagine kindergartners exposed to “comprehensive sex education,” it’s more reasonable to think the purview was expanded because statistics in Illinois showed those children at risk for sexually transmitted diseases and teen pregnancy were sexually active before the sixth grade.  Why kindergarten was chosen as opposed to 3rd grade, we’re not sure, but we’re fairly certain the nightmare scenario McCain’s campaign is alluding to is far more benign in reality since all sex education material was made age appropriate, as the revamped school code specified.

We should also note the old school code contained only 3 elements of criteria sex education course materials needed to achieve for grades 6 to 12.  They were:

  (2)  Course material  and  instruction  shall  teach
29        honor and respect for monogamous heterosexual marriage.
30             (3)  Course  material  and  instruction shall stress
31        that pupils should abstain from sexual intercourse  until
32        they are ready for marriage.
33             (4)  Course material and instruction shall include a
34        discussion  of  the  possible emotional and psychological

                            -3-      LRB093 05269 NHT 05359 b

 1        consequences  of  preadolescent  and  adolescent   sexual
 2        intercourse  outside  of marriage and the consequences of
 3        unwanted adolescent pregnancy.


18        of  the
19        circumstances under which it is  unlawful  for  males  to
20        have sexual relations with females under the age of 18 to
21        whom  they  are not married pursuant to Article 12 of the
22        Criminal Code of 1961, as now or hereafter amended.

Obama’s changes to the Illinois school code expanded sex education beyond 1950s rhetoric about abstinence and heterosexual marriage to address the contemporary concerns faced by changing demographics and social mores.  It also expanded culpability of statutory rape to adult women and added education regarding the inappropriate nature of domestic abuse.  He supported amendments that emphasized awareness, deterrence and personal responsibility, not just codified avoidance.  This “comprehensive sex education” reform reached out to students, yes even as early as kindergarten, to develop the critical thinking tools to learn how to control sexuality and wield it responsibly, not suppress it.  One notable passage added to the school code endorsed by Obama seems like it could have been authored by a Family Values republican advocating personal responsibility over Government support or edict:

27             (10)  Course   material   and   instruction    shall
28        emphasize  that  the  pupil  has  the  power  to  control
29        personal  behavior.  Pupils  shall  be encouraged to base
30        their actions on  reasoning,  self-discipline,  sense  of
31        responsibility, self-control, and ethical considerations,
32        such as respect for oneself and others.

What a monster!  Obama is wrong for your family!  In the family life section of the bill, Obama and others seem to offer up the only reasonable method of addressing the universal ideal of legal, safe and rare abortions:

 7        (a)  If   any   school   district   provides  courses  of
 8    instruction designed to promote wholesome  and  comprehensive
 9    understanding of the emotional, psychological, physiological,
10    hygienic  and  social  responsibility aspects of family life,
11    then such courses of instruction shall include  the  teaching
12    of prevention of unintended pregnancy and all options related
13    to  unintended  pregnancy,  as  the alternatives to abortion,
14    appropriate to the various grade levels

Before Obama and company redefined the school code the only sex education students were getting dealt with what to do after a pregnancy, not how to avoid an unwanted one.  If that’s not responsible government and truly “comprehensive sex education,” then I don’t know what is.  A pregnant 17-year-old in the White House, perhaps?


2 Responses to Obama, Bristol, Sex & Kindergarten

  1. JustAnotherMoJa says:

    Well, haven’t we already established the fact that Palin’s idea about female reproductive physiology are JUST NOT RIGHT, and neither are those of the people she has been appointed to appease.
    I mean, choosing to bring in a child that would suffer all through its limited life-span, using it as a show-piece to the entire world, not to mention announcing “Levi fuckin-redneck Johnson” is going to be her son-in-law? Just shows the lengths these people would go to make your small-town-values people happy. I’d say you wasted a lot of effort in making this entry because your average school board doesn’t care about children’s physical and psychological health. They don’t care, as long as they’re “defending the rights” of a little blob of cells they’re going to label a baby as opposed to a living breathing child suffering through an unwanted and unplanned pregnancy in front of them.

  2. […] to find a media outlet that uncovered the truth on McCain’s accusations against Obama that he supported sex education for kindergartners faster than your boys at […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: